October 27, 2022 at 6:23 PM
Letter to President Putin
Hello, dear Vladimir Vladimirovich! I am writing to you from the places of incarceration, convicted for the illegal sale of drugs on 228.1. Since this crime is somehow considered a particularly serious, the punishment is appropriate: 16 years of maximum security. I really do not understand why the state has singled out this article, which has long been called "people's". It is one of the articles where there are no victims at all. Not at all. The prosecutor is a faceless state. A soulless machine, which does not care about the fate of the people.
I can understand when they give 16 years to a man who killed his neighbor while drinking alcohol, and not only killed him, but also cut off his head. But he gets eight years, of which he will serve two-thirds and be out on parole. But another degenerate like that, who killed three homeless people, gets 12 years. You can get the same 12 years by selling tenths of a gram of synthetic cannabinoid. Just think about it: the scales of the law equate the taking of three lives, even if ruined by alcohol, with the sale of a small sachet that brings short-lived but most honest pleasure. The state is so against the right of its citizens to choose pleasure according to taste that it punishes them by depriving them of a third or even half of their lives. Left home for the treasure at twenty, returned deep into their thirties. And this in our time, when the speed of new information exceeds the speed of its cognition. If a hundred years ago, a convict from Siberia would go back to the places he used to be, where the trees had grown up and the people had grown old, now, on his return from the penal colony there is the risk of getting lost in his native city and of being frightened by the achievements of scientific and technological progress when he goes to get milk from the store. Everything is changing very quickly, only you as commander-in-chief are unchanged. I'm sure you'll be president even when I get out. Even if not by amnesty or parole, available, for some reason, after serving 3/4 of the sentence, not 2/3, as with ordinary, not "people's" articles.
When the case happened with the journalist Golunov, who was detained with a narcotic substance, he was saved not by the fact that there were no fingerprints and traces of DNA on the bags, but by the fact that he was a journalist. Probably a liberal, since the public rose to his defense and people came to the rally in numbers that no one expected. Of course, it is not excluded that he was in fact fluffing his nostrils and your brains, but without the evidence base we still should not have accepted him. It's just that those who detained Golunov were used to working without direct evidence, knowing that under this article there are no acquittals and there is no way to challenge the decision of the court. But in this case, the public did not let the man's life be broken, and therefore a public flogging was carried out on those who wanted to remove the unwanted man in the easiest and most reliable way. And how many young guys like this all over the country, who were arrested at home with the phone or near the site of the planting? The good news is that after this case, the sentences for 228.1 are actually less, because now they give an average of 6 to 8 years for trafficking. But what about those who were given 10-16 years for the same crime?
The appeals and cassation courts are a sham and a budget burner. They don't consider the complaints they receive and leave almost all the original sentences unchanged. Lawyers charge exorbitant fees, at best imitating the feverish activity. Some make no secret of their indifference to the outcome of the process. Perhaps this is due to the fact that they are not in principle able to influence the decision of judges, obviously, working according to a template, running decisions of cases through a single algorithm. The only way to influence the outcome of a case is through corruption, which is what we see in the news about the rich and famous. Incredibly, they get ridiculous sentences, and that is if they failed to bring the case to court, even in spite of the wide publicity.
And how frustrating it is to see famous people on various shows and talk shows who are clearly under the influence of substances and get away with it.
I, too, want to have everything and get away with it. What should I do? Become an MP? Maybe found a lysergic-dissociative party in Russia, the LDPR 2.0? A leader just like Zhirinovsky - absurd, at first glance, ideas, righteous anger toward short-sighted and dishonest politicians, liberal bills, while simultaneously supporting the policies of our main party. At times, reading some of the bills, one begins to understand why
The bill to test deputies for drug use was not passed. I wonder why? Unlikely because the deputies deliberately destroy drugs by using, with the noble goal of not living to retirement and rid the budget of obligations to pay pensions. I, on the other hand, am noble. I would not go around sawing off public money, inappropriately spending funds, engaging in embezzlement, and exceeding my official authority. Maybe it is because of these beliefs that I did not have a career as an ordinary person, but maybe I can try? In the new Russia which is already being formed and built by new people there must be our Russian mental generosity and forgiveness. A chance to live a new life under new conditions must be given. Today there is no longer that oppressive feeling of hopelessness of the future and embittered powerlessness, but a desire to be creative and create constructive things. Therefore I ask you, Vladimir Vladimirovich, to give us, freedom-loving, but naive because we are young, a chance to return as soon as possible to a full-fledged social life. Existence determines consciousness. But for now I am trying my best not to degrade and be lost in the mass of faceless thousands of prisoners, deprived of the opportunity to become useful to Russia of the future.
Looking at today's changes, I want to believe that they will lead to large-scale changes in all spheres, and whether they will be positive or negative largely depends on you.
"VLADIMIR VLADIMIROVICH PUTIN, I BEG YOU, SET ME FREE!
Hello, dear Vladimir Vladimirovich! I am writing to you from the places of incarceration, convicted for the illegal sale of drugs on 228.1. Since this crime is somehow considered a particularly serious, the punishment is appropriate: 16 years of maximum security. I really do not understand why the state has singled out this article, which has long been called "people's". It is one of the articles where there are no victims at all. Not at all. The prosecutor is a faceless state. A soulless machine, which does not care about the fate of the people.
I can understand when they give 16 years to a man who killed his neighbor while drinking alcohol, and not only killed him, but also cut off his head. But he gets eight years, of which he will serve two-thirds and be out on parole. But another degenerate like that, who killed three homeless people, gets 12 years. You can get the same 12 years by selling tenths of a gram of synthetic cannabinoid. Just think about it: the scales of the law equate the taking of three lives, even if ruined by alcohol, with the sale of a small sachet that brings short-lived but most honest pleasure. The state is so against the right of its citizens to choose pleasure according to taste that it punishes them by depriving them of a third or even half of their lives. Left home for the treasure at twenty, returned deep into their thirties. And this in our time, when the speed of new information exceeds the speed of its cognition. If a hundred years ago, a convict from Siberia would go back to the places he used to be, where the trees had grown up and the people had grown old, now, on his return from the penal colony there is the risk of getting lost in his native city and of being frightened by the achievements of scientific and technological progress when he goes to get milk from the store. Everything is changing very quickly, only you as commander-in-chief are unchanged. I'm sure you'll be president even when I get out. Even if not by amnesty or parole, available, for some reason, after serving 3/4 of the sentence, not 2/3, as with ordinary, not "people's" articles.
When the case happened with the journalist Golunov, who was detained with a narcotic substance, he was saved not by the fact that there were no fingerprints and traces of DNA on the bags, but by the fact that he was a journalist. Probably a liberal, since the public rose to his defense and people came to the rally in numbers that no one expected. Of course, it is not excluded that he was in fact fluffing his nostrils and your brains, but without the evidence base we still should not have accepted him. It's just that those who detained Golunov were used to working without direct evidence, knowing that under this article there are no acquittals and there is no way to challenge the decision of the court. But in this case, the public did not let the man's life be broken, and therefore a public flogging was carried out on those who wanted to remove the unwanted man in the easiest and most reliable way. And how many young guys like this all over the country, who were arrested at home with the phone or near the site of the planting? The good news is that after this case, the sentences for 228.1 are actually less, because now they give an average of 6 to 8 years for trafficking. But what about those who were given 10-16 years for the same crime?
The appeals and cassation courts are a sham and a budget burner. They don't consider the complaints they receive and leave almost all the original sentences unchanged. Lawyers charge exorbitant fees, at best imitating the feverish activity. Some make no secret of their indifference to the outcome of the process. Perhaps this is due to the fact that they are not in principle able to influence the decision of judges, obviously, working according to a template, running decisions of cases through a single algorithm. The only way to influence the outcome of a case is through corruption, which is what we see in the news about the rich and famous. Incredibly, they get ridiculous sentences, and that is if they failed to bring the case to court, even in spite of the wide publicity.
And how frustrating it is to see famous people on various shows and talk shows who are clearly under the influence of substances and get away with it.
I, too, want to have everything and get away with it. What should I do? Become an MP? Maybe found a lysergic-dissociative party in Russia, the LDPR 2.0? A leader just like Zhirinovsky - absurd, at first glance, ideas, righteous anger toward short-sighted and dishonest politicians, liberal bills, while simultaneously supporting the policies of our main party. At times, reading some of the bills, one begins to understand why
The bill to test deputies for drug use was not passed. I wonder why? Unlikely because the deputies deliberately destroy drugs by using, with the noble goal of not living to retirement and rid the budget of obligations to pay pensions. I, on the other hand, am noble. I would not go around sawing off public money, inappropriately spending funds, engaging in embezzlement, and exceeding my official authority. Maybe it is because of these beliefs that I did not have a career as an ordinary person, but maybe I can try? In the new Russia which is already being formed and built by new people there must be our Russian mental generosity and forgiveness. A chance to live a new life under new conditions must be given. Today there is no longer that oppressive feeling of hopelessness of the future and embittered powerlessness, but a desire to be creative and create constructive things. Therefore I ask you, Vladimir Vladimirovich, to give us, freedom-loving, but naive because we are young, a chance to return as soon as possible to a full-fledged social life. Existence determines consciousness. But for now I am trying my best not to degrade and be lost in the mass of faceless thousands of prisoners, deprived of the opportunity to become useful to Russia of the future.
Looking at today's changes, I want to believe that they will lead to large-scale changes in all spheres, and whether they will be positive or negative largely depends on you.
"VLADIMIR VLADIMIROVICH PUTIN, I BEG YOU, SET ME FREE!
Did you like the article? Like it! Donation to the author for cigarettes:
Bitcoin:
bc1qhkmjmj62vvjq7hsjzm7564crcsu2ymmye69f4z
Monero:
8B8hTJwGTfvSWxtZbU5iXVgg4QxxuTpTfdVBy1ZwWkSWD3BbMqH7qVGKNukp3WNPw8J9KdMahoNjR79utgTkZFTh8h3Btnc
Bitcoin:
bc1qhkmjmj62vvjq7hsjzm7564crcsu2ymmye69f4z
Monero:
8B8hTJwGTfvSWxtZbU5iXVgg4QxxuTpTfdVBy1ZwWkSWD3BbMqH7qVGKNukp3WNPw8J9KdMahoNjR79utgTkZFTh8h3Btnc
